ورود به حساب کاربری

نام کاربری *
رمز عبور *
مرا به خاطر بسپار.

ایجاد یک حساب کاربری

پر کردن فیلدهایی که با ستاره (*) نشانه گذاری شده ضروری است.
نام *
نام کاربری *
رمز عبور *
تکرار رمز عبور *
ایمیل *
تکرار ایمیل *

Review meeting of the book "New Correction from Rumi's Letters" to the Corrections and Excerpts of Mr. Dr. Tofigh Sobhani

Review meeting of the book "New Correction from Rumi's Letters" to the Corrections and Excerpts of Mr. Dr. Tofigh Sobhani

 

A review of the book, "New Correction from the Rumi Letters," to the Corrections and Excerpts of Mr. Dr. Tofigh Sobhani, with the presence of the distinguished lawyers of Dr. Mohammad Gholamrezaee, Dr. Mohammad Reza Movahedi, and Mr. Yousef Mohammad Nejad, Head of the Research Institute Persian language and literature, and Dr. Seyyed Aliasghar Mir Bagheri, Chairman of the Board of the Association for the Promotion of Persian Language and Literature, and a group of scholars and students from 10/12/10 at 10:00 pm in the Literature Hall of the Institute of Humanities and Studies The cultural center was sponsored by the Persian Language and Literature Institute in cooperation with the Persian Language Promotion Association.

First, Mr. Dr. Mohammad Nejad, at the beginning of the presentation of the story of the publication and various copies of Mowlavi's letters, was inspired by Dr. Sobhani's book to express the contents of the invitation book. Dr. Sobhani also mentioned the works of Mowlana and the importance of those works in the written text, which contained 144 letters from Mowlana Jalal al-Din, and also introduced their versions used in this correction, based on the version of Marashi's library. .

   Then Mr. Dr. Mohammad Gholam Razaei, a professor at Shahid Beheshti University, while stating that there are three types of Maulana's prose works: 1. Biosphere congregation, which has significant affections, 2. Letters written in letters of letters, 3. Mafia ma'fi, which has a pronounced speech, but a particular structure There were no comments on various aspects of Dr. Sobhani's correction, including the need for content analysis and classification of the letters in the preamble, as well as a discussion of the linguistic and linguistic coordinates of this work and the material about the conceptual and linguistic parallels between the writings and other works of Rumi Which has been neglected in the eyes of the corrector. At the end of the day, he also corrected a few examples with an example, some of which were accepted by the editors.

Further, Dr. Mohammad Reza Movahedi, a member of the faculty of the Institute of Language and Literature, highlighted the important points for correcting the book, and emphasized that this work, given its importance in the field of studies on Rumi, should have a more detailed introduction. In the introduction to the method of correction and introduction of the manuscript with more clarity and methodology, because the explanation is not about the same edition, and their detailed specifications are not mentioned, but only the image of a linear version of the page that the review and the counter of the same page shows that The editors did not adhere to it. Also, in the number of references to the text of the corrections written by Golpinari, there have been some vowels and that the printed text has some media errors that need to be considered in the next edition to resolve these issues.

At the end of the letter, Mr. Mirbagheri referred to the necessity of organizing the method of correcting the texts, and that all the conditions of the Rumi have been provided to revise, revise and analyze content of Rumi's works both inside and outside the country.